Spill trial under way


Published/Last Modified on Friday, September 19, 2003 4:10 PM CDT


Opening arguments presented in latest chemical release case

BY ELEANOR EVANS

THE DAILY NEWS

Advertisement
FRANKLINTON - Nearly eight years after a union tank car exploded outside of Gaylord Chemical, releasing a cloud of nitrogen tetroxide into a part of Bogalusa, opening statements began Tuesday for the trial against Gaylord Chemical, Gaylord Container and Union Tank Car.

During opening statements, plaintiffs' attorneys claimed that the chemical had been contaminated by water left in the tank car for a period of 7-10 days, that, in combination with corroded pipes in the car, resulted in the creation of contaminated nitrogen tetroxide that caused the explosion.

Plaintiffs' attorneys also claimed Union Tank Car neglected to investigate the corrosion of the pipes and had one month before the explosion to inform Gaylord of the car's impending dangers.

The attorneys claimed the corrosion occurred because Union Tank Car neglected to use Teflon packing required by the federal government in 1985 for handling five chemicals including nitrogen tetroxide.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs stated that Gaylord neglected to take appropriate precautions in case of such an event, and neglected to inform the community of the type of chemical that was released.

Plaintiffs allege that Gaylord appointed Vicksburg Chemical, the sole manufacturer of nitrogen tetroxide in the U.S., as the emergency response team without informing Vicksburg Chemical of their duties.

The plaintiffs claim this explosion caused permanent health conditions directly related to the chemical release.

Defense attorneys stated that neither Gaylord Chemical nor Union Tank Car were responsible for weighing, loading, and testing samples from the railcar.

Attorneys claim those responsibilities are held by Vicksburg Chemical.

According to the attorneys, Union Tank Car met government specifications regarding the packing of the railcar when it was specifically converted to a nitrogen tetroxide car in 1982.

Defense attorneys also claimed that as the only manufacturer of nitrogen tetroxide, Vicksburg Chemical had the "premiere" emergency response team for handling a chemical release and that the company was aware that it was assigned as such to Gaylord.

Eighteen randomly selected representatives of the 15,981 class action plaintiffs will testify on their behalf over the next 10-12 weeks.

Gaylord attorneys claimed during opening statements that none of the fifteen representatives claiming medical injury have incurred health conditions directly related to the release.

The remaining three have claimed "fear, fright" and economic loss and evacuation expenses as a result of the explosion.

Comments

Write a Comment

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Daily News is not liable for messages from third parties.



DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in gobogalusa.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Daily News. The Daily News does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Daily News spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   

Contact Us




Make Us Your Homepage

Advertisement